Originally Posted By: Salmo g.
Ya' know, if these two sides of us would unite, and recruit even more members, we could steer CCA in the direction that serves recreational fishing best,....


You would think 9000 members would be enough to steer CCA_PNW policy in a more sensible direction?

Originally Posted By: Salmo g.
We don't need ANY non-treaty commercial fishing of spring chinook. We already have a treaty fishery on them that catches 13 of the 15% ESA impact that is presently allowed. We ought to be supporting extinction of LCR commercial fishing instead of re-igniting this counter-productive debate between recreational salmon anglers every few weeks.Sg


That's the direction we need. (Unless you want to keep fighting allocation battles which gain us ZERO in longterm benefits.
_________________________