Originally Posted By: Todd
I'm not sure that anyone's demonstrated that 90% mortality on outgoing smolts out of Puget Sound actually is a problem...it might be a perfectly normal number, it may have always been that way...but historically there hundreds of millions of wild smolts leaving Puget Sound, so if only ten percent of them survived, it would still have been millions and millions of smolts.

Fish on...

Todd


Perfectly normal or not, wouldn't it be an advantage to know what the loss was from before you address long term viability for hatchery supplementation? Oncy T's last link spoke directly to what types of selective traits can skew genetic success/productivity results. We don't even know what the cause is, much less how it affects attributes we select for supplementation. What kind of accuracy will we get from studies done with an 800lb gorilla in the room? As excited as I was to learn the possible opportunities associated with such a controlled study, it all falls apart with the amount of unknown impact.


Edited by Hair (01/18/11 01:30 AM)