I think some of the tribes are just as scared about Boldt II as the state is. There is that pesky clause Boldt added in about a moderate income. There is no way the tribes would be willing to disclose how much they make or where the money is going to. A quick glance, however, would indicate that many members have more than adequate means to get a moderate income by means other than just fishing. In addition, the tribes have benefited greatly from most of the same development that they would be fighting. Strip malls, a sea port, large timber tracts, hotels, casinos, etc. It is very possible that a reopening of Boldt would determine the tribes can easily make a moderate income from other investments and from other fisheries beside salmon and Steelhead, such as crabs, clams, sea cucumbers, gooey ducs and that the income from these new fisheries is well beyond the original income that they could have imagined from the fisheries taking place at the time of the treaty. Not all tribes have these options, but the ones that do are those that are making the most trouble. A guaranteed fishery that meets subsistence and cerimonial purposes could be all they truely are guaranteed