Come on guys, remember the way the court law is written. Going to the NOAA is not the answer. If the state can actually write up a plan that is fair, they simply need to bring it to the table. The tribes can bring their solution. If no agreement is made, open up the fisheries advisory board and take both plans there. Once the court has made a decision, both sides could live with it or take it to the next level. In between, if I read the law correctly, we get to fish on the courts decision. May not be perfect, but if nothing else I would think all the differences would become public. The courts anticipated bullying by the State, not the tribe, but they set up a plan to deal with it. It is up to the state to implement it.