Agree with cobble.
Eyefish and Salmo G for the LOSS . I cannot understand how someone with education cannot understand basic science. It must be your pride that keeps you on the same path and unable to change.

Salmo G please actually take time to read the article before commenting on it. I used to respect your knowledge of Fisheries but it is obvious that you did not read this article as this study was conducted after the termination of the upriver summer run program. Yes this is above the North Fork dam in the upper Clackamas. That run was terminated in 2001 because of people like you who say that Hatchery fish are bad for wild fish. At least in this case the summer run fish did not affect the wild winter fish at all. Do you really think that the scientists that published this article would have been as stupid as you are in thinking that the fish are completely segregated and have no effect on each other? If you are so against hatchery fish a better argument would be run timing and location. Both of those are pointed out in the research article which is not as biased as the two of you are. Your comments and the eyeFish comments just go to show how biased the two of you are against Hatchery fish. You two should take some responsibility for the decline of Hatchery fish as you all have continued to promote that Hatchery fish are bad based on a poorly conducted study done in Oregon approximately 30 years ago. My guess is that the two of you will be too proud to admit that you never read the article and that you are wrong.