I don't think Boldt II guaranteed dead fish in the boat. I believe the Court held that the treaty right to fish would be meaningless without fish. The Court did not establish any minimum threshold number of fish, only a treat right maximum up to "a moderate living." There would still be hatchery fish - federal Mitchell Act hatchery fish and the several mitigation hatcheries operated and funded by PUDs and the like. And some state hatcheries that return enough salmon to justify the taxpayer investment, assuming for the moment there are any.