Considering there are hundreds of millions of Muslim adults around the world, and there are hundreds of millions of Anglo-American adults around the world, splitting fractions of fractions of percentages between the number of people involved in the WTC attack and the OKC attack is silly, so justifying profiling based upon those numbers is flimsy at best.

I used Angry White Men not because I have some sort of "issues". It was a way to identify the two men who were identified to be involved in the OKC attack, simply because it hurts too much to call them Americans. My point on them is the same as the Muslims. What does an Angry White Man capable of doing such atrocities look like? What does a Muslim person capable of doing such atrocities look like?

You don't know, do you?

Guess what? Neither do I. But I sure as Hell am not going to accept a blanket "Be wary of all Muslims" statement, because the next step is bigotry. And bigotry's biggest fertilizer is ignorance.