I'm definitely opposed to the war at this stage of the game. If G.W. had the goods on Iraq possessing weapons, then why wouldn't he be able to convince the heads of other nations? Truth is, he doesn't have any evidence or he'd show it to somebody.

Secondly, he has been unable to demonstrate a connection between Al Quida and Iraq. Just because he says theres a connection doesn't make one. He needs to prove the connection and once again, has not.

Thirdly, G.W. lacks to ability to unite people. His tough Texas-speak has polarized nations, not brought them together.

If Bush goes against the U.N., is he any different than Saddam?

Twig