Quote:
I'm definitely opposed to the war at this stage of the game. If G.W. had the goods on Iraq possessing weapons, then why wouldn't he be able to convince the heads of other nations? Truth is, he doesn't have any evidence or he'd show it to somebody.

Secondly, he has been unable to demonstrate a connection between Al Quida and Iraq. Just because he says theres a connection doesn't make one. He needs to prove the connection and once again, has not.
Hell, I am opposed too, but it's my job! It is a duty I swore to- Support and Defend the Constitution of the United States of America.

First, Iraq is not in compliance with the first resolution. Documented destruction of their MWD. Where is it if it hasn't been documented as destroyed? If it has been destroyed, why isn't it documented? Unfortunately the burden of proof is on us... I have a strong feeling we'll have an answer shortly.

Secondly, most Americans are using selective hearing on this issue. Connection issue? Yes, future connections. This, my friend, has been proven through numerous intelligence sources. To demonstrate this would be costly to security of the nation and the personnel collecting it!

Most unfortunate will the use of WMD on our troops this war. Then, the Administration will say, "Told you so." And that scares the sh!t out of me...

Downriggin'
_________________________
"If you are not scratchin bottom, you ain't fishing deep enough!" -DR

Puget Sound Anglers, Gig Harbor Chapter