Once again no facts coming forth.
We didn't hire him. The majority didn't vote for him. And we sure wouldn't have for his "judgement" based upon his resume.
Your argument seems to be if you can't prove he's not a terrorist or sponsored terrorism then he must be a terrorist. I for one will deny that he's a terrorist until I see proof otherwise. Bush needs to start sharing the facts which all of this is supposedly based upon. In fact he would be in a lot less hot water had he done so which tells me there are no facts to substantiate those claims and without that we have an unjust war. Plain and simple. In one single post you have lost all credibility on this subject BBVD.