Guys, the rest of the report most likely reads like the one I read, which speaks of the admins. adherence to the belief that Saddam has direct ties to Al Quaeda (i.e., funding their activities, I presume), but no direct responsiblity for the 9/11 attacks themselves.

I find that distinction a little weak (purposely understated), but it's apparently enough rationalization for them to feel like they're off the hook.