"The way I see it, we dont know anything unless Bush wants us to. We could know less then 1% of the information against Iraq.

I'll hold out for that 1%... Either way, we got rid of a terrorist. Who can deny that the man was NOT a terrorist?

Next, who can possibly deny that he sponsered terrorism? His regime alone was self sponsered. And if Bush says he was sponsering Al Quada, I dont need to see proof. That's why we hired him in the first place. Judgement."

I'm doing my best not to laugh here.

1) I'm thinking only an idiot would withhold information that would improve his standing with the voters. You can't seriously believe what you're saying....not without having actually given it some critical thought.

I agree Saddam is a terrorist, but as far as we KNOW, his terrorism has been limited primarily to his own people and his neighbors that we turned out backs on.

2) We don't know that we've gotten rid of anyone. For all we know Saddam is kickin' it with Osama. Or, he's running from Osama. Who knows? I haven't seen his corpse or any claims that we've identified his body.

3) You can believe what you believe, but don't tell me it's fact just because you believe it to be true. What's the proof that he's sponsored Al-Quaida?

4) You're one of those guys that believes everything an elected official tells you if you voted for them, and don't believe anything they tell you if you didn't, aren't you?