Originally posted by eddie:
Jacob, I must disagree. Here are the facts (as reported by WDFW in punchcard counts) for the Nisqually.
1980 1414 killed
1981 1349
1982 1374
1983 1263
1984 1916
1985 1960
1986 I don't have the data
1987 2346
1988 1273
These are not insignificant numbers. Keep in mind these were all wild steelhead. I can't remember when the Nisko was closed, and I don't have easily accessed data for other years, but I think you get the idea.
But how many wild fish were killed in nets? Now, I could be wrong here, I don't have the data handy, but, for example, let's say that during those years you mentioned, would the run size have still declined albeit at a slower pace had there been full C&R? That's what it boils down to. What's the point of going full C&R, limiting sportsmen even more, if the run size is still going to decline? Going full C&R for wild steelhead obviously didn't help on the Snohomish system, which is why we are now reduced to a fishery that ends the end of February. I just don't want to lose opportunity when the end result is going to be almost nil. The bottom line is that you can close down every river in this state to sport fishing year round and the runs will still decline because the state and feds refuse to recognize the cause of the problem.