I think all the repetitive arguments about the WSR moratorium fail to focus on what most of the opposition is all about . It is not in opposition to releasing wild steelhead but it is in opposition to the process by which the new rule was implemented by the WDFW commission. I think it could be viewed as a precedent setting process which could bode ill in the future. In the future a small group could ramrod a policy through that curtails fishing without due process. Villifying opponents of the moratorium is missing the point that maybe alot of people who do alot for fish and fishing are, themselves, opponents of the moratorium for reasons that have nothing to do with being able to kill a wild steelhead.