grandpa,

I agree that there is repetitiveness, but I don't agree that process is the only issue that folks have with it...there have been arguments of giving fish to Indians, stealing them from "real" fishermen, using junk science to justify the restrictions, economic arguments, etc., etc., etc.,

There have, however, been repeated comments about due process, too. In spite of what some folks and organizations feel, there was no problem with the process...no one did anything untoward, and certainly there was nothing in any way, shape, or form illegal.

Several folks have alleged that it violates their constitutional rights, their right to fish, and numerous laws, though none have been able to come up with a cogent answer for how...other than repeating that it did.

Perhaps you know of a law that no one else has brought up yet, or hasn't been able to make a reasonable argument for yet, that you could share and show me exactly where something went wrong?

Remember that when Mayor Reed met with members of the Commission, Chair Roehl (who, by the way voted against the moratorium) informed her that there was no problem with the process...and from what I understand, someone from the AG's office opined the same thing.

I also don't think that asking people to back up their arguments with facts and logic, rather than innuendo, opinion, and conspiracy theories is "villifying" them...

Fish on...

Todd