Originally Posted By: N W Panhandler


Double haul, in no way am I knocking any other orginzation, but what all the clubs and assocs dont have is large numbers of members. If I have read it right, the CCA in washington already has over thirteen hundred members, and CCA NW totol of over 3000. This outfit is just getting off the ground. Guys like you if you are not already should be a part of it. You can be a member of two orgs. The CCA very likley will not do anything you do not like, it will be the members that direct it. Tight lines


No knock considered, I have been working my rear off the last 8 years with Todd and other individuals that have proven to me how dedicated they are to create change for wild steelhead. And we have all heard many nay sayers from day one and many critics, but the bottom line is we have been there and in my honest opinion we have been creating positive change for the plight of wild steelhead. The organization maybe not huge, but our resolve is.

I am interested in what happens with the CCA, but what I have come to realize is that there are two general directions/philosphies of organizations:
1. Work to put the fish first and by their abundance will create your opportunity
2. Work for your opportunity/share first and then the fish.
Too me the jury is still out regarding where the CCA stands, I can't afford to get involved because of my investment the WSC. I wish the CCA luck and hope they take direction number 1.

I sincerely invite the CCA leadership's participation in the Steelhead Summit Alliance, (SSA), where they will learn and increase their education in steelhead science and issues and be a truly productive conservation group, or part of a true coalition of groups if you will, for stronger voice for steelhead in the Northwest.


Edited by Double Haul (01/13/08 02:47 AM)
_________________________
Decisions and changes seldom occur by posting on Internet bulletin boards.