"O.K., I'll give you military information if you will take me to the hospital." -U.S. News and World Report, May 14, 1973 article written by former POW John McCain
How is that not collusion? Fonda was never charged with treason either, so saying my opinion of what he did is worse does in no way imply I believe his actions were treasonous. Another assumption by you.

What conditions must be taken into account to determine whether the CoC was violated? I've read it for years and have never seen any conditions written. It's pretty binary.

The report said, "McCain was quoted describing the number of aircraft in his flight, information about rescue ships, and the order of which his attack was supposed to take place. "
And you said, "...remarks that endangered no one's life at the time..."
Now that is funny. Your naive ignorance is almost cute.

"By the way" means simply look at the facts surrounding a subject. I didn't say he was responsible for the Forrestal fire, but obviously many of his shipmates did on the site you chose to read. Ergo, there is speculation by some that he was directly involved with its cause. However, another historical site doesn't even mention that he was assigned to the ship. I found that odd considering his notoriety. There's no irrefutable proof that he either was or was not involved. Smart discerning readers look at both sides when doing investigative research.

I can't smear McCain, your party already did in 2000. I have merely posted excerpts of what the R's have said earlier, or quotes from McCain himself. I'm simply reminding people of what your party has already said. It's your inherent hypocrisy that will not allow you to understand that.

Yet you are a fervent McCain supporter and will undoubtedly vote Republican. Others, too, have noticed you've become a hypocritically inconsistent partisan hack putting party before country-- and now you're playing the victim card.
Very sad.