SBD,

Not just Dworshak; also Winthrop, Leavenworth, Yakima, Klickitat, Carson, Little White Salmon, Chelan, Priest Rapids, Rapid R., Hells Canyon (?), Wenaha-Grand Ronde, Umatilla, Deschutes/White R., Sandy, and I may have left out one or two.

Fish monger,

In a word, yes. Treaty rights are legally very powerful.

Todd,

Just thinking out loud here, but why is catch balancing so controlling? Is it a central part of the Columbia R. fishing agreement? In other situations it would be deemed a foregone opportunity by the treaty tribes; that is, the fish are there to be caught provided they choose to fish selectively. But by deciding not to, they forego considerable harvest opportunity. Why should the non-treaty sector be held to "catch balancing" if they are willing and able to fish selectively and harvest more of the hatchery fish? Just a thought, not actually trying to stir the pot further.

Sg