Before the Scrotus did their thing, I was convinced that what we had was another "Old guys screw the young guys" thing, and I'm still not sure if that is still the case. I suspect it is, but the whole damn thing is way over-written and a mind-twister, pregnant with legal entanglements, IMO.

So now we shall have young folks who don't need insurance paying for old turds who need ridiculous amounts of medical attention. KK will tell you (unless he's admits that he was wrong) that risk pools work just fine when the only participants are people who need medical attention, and that there would be no need to force healthy people to participate.....which is wrong, wrong, wrong. So my question is .... Are there sufficient numbers of young people who presently don't have insurance to offset the sick old cronies with prior conditions? I really doubt it.....really doubt it! So then.......the only result from that is ..... EVERYBODY WHO PRESENTLY HAS GOOD COVERAGE WILL SEE A DOWNGRADE IN THEIR QUALITY OF COVERAGE AND/OR AN INCREASE IN THEIR COSTS.

So if that is the result you "Save the World" enthusiasts expect......you got it.

Me? As an old fart whose body will no doubt begin to fall apart and the costs associated with keeping my cranky old azz healthy enough to continue stealing your fish skyrocket.......well, all I can say is....Gee, Thanks!

Your confidence in your never-ending ability to pay for all of your wishes is both amazing and, I believe....completely naive.

But, really.......thanks!

Free Spenders Unite!!