What I said was,,,

The dipshat scientists you are rfering to are not credible anyways so how can they discredit something that's legitimate when their motive has nothing to do with actual science?

When I say they are not credible, I mean that what they do and say is subservient to an agenda or a loyalty and has nothing to do with truth or legitimacy. If they were honest there is no possible way they could say the study was false.