Just want to clarify that I'm not for an either/or approach either. IF it comes to that, I stand by my preference for terminal over mixed stock fisheries. I suppose there is question about whether that provides the best opportunity to the most citizens, but I don't think there should be any question that would be the more fish-friendly way to go. Seeing as our fisheries are more or less constrained by ESA impacts, I think it makes sense to protect as many endangered fish as possible, and mixed stock fisheries (even selective ones) fall short of that mark.