Flatbrim,

If you believe you deserve a say in whether a woman may have an abortion, then a group of women deserve a say and can vote that you must have a vasectomy while you're young because they think you're to ugly to father children.

The idea here is about fundamental freedom. You want to decide when a woman has freedom, so being an even minded person you must be OK with others deciding what you can be free to do or not do. Aha, you say, but what about the freedom or rights of the unborn? The unborn is a fetus and is not a person or citizen with rights until born. I know, it gets messy as a fetus develops and progresses toward birth and personhood, but birth is the line in the sand legally. Calling a fetus an unborn person, child, or citizen is an artifact of semantics. BTW, I'm personally not so much in favor of abortion, but I am overwhelmingly in favor of personal freedom. I'd rather not have others imposing their will on me, so I in turn will mind my own damn business and not impose my will on them.

And I did not ask you for your tax dollars to fund abortions, but will remind you that we all pay taxes that often fund specific things that we'd rather not be paying for. That's how a pluralistic society works. You don't always get what you want.

And as for comparing the 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms with abortion, I'll remind you that not every individual and personal right is enumerated individually in the Constitution, but abortion is rightly covered by the 4th and 9th Amendments, which a few disgraceful SCOTUS justices conveniently ignored in the Dobbs decision.