Well some porn and some really disgusting art forms are protected under the 1st but it dosent say them specifically. I'm OK with them but other people are highly offened by it. Admitedly caught red handed crooks and murderers go free by loop hole open interpretations to search and seizure, trials, and due process. The courts do make the decisions but there are some who view the 2nd as only applying to militias. Its the "security a free state" part that is the most open to me. A gunman with intent of killing people at a school presents a portion of a non-free state localized to that school. Do we need armed well regulated militia volunteers to guard the schools instead of police? Or can one person act as their own well regulated militia and make a choice to weather to bear arms for the protection of that free state? I believe that gun free zones at schools have created high potential for a localized non-free state.