Nick, what I'm looking for is to have the NRA et al. come to the table with something other than "We need more guns" or "We need to enforce the laws already on the books". It appears the latest shooter is another person who got their gun legally, had no prior criminal record and his first crime was mass murder. We have had at least 23 deaths in the last two weeks that we know of that fits this description, there probably are more that didn't make the National news. As Hank points out, 1639 will do nothing to eliminate this problem. But, it passed in a landslide because there was no alternative. In the absence of anything from the gun activist community, the general population will reach the proper and inescapable conclusion that the gun activists care more about the right to keep and bear arms than they do about people's lives. That is a position that will lead to more and more 1639's. So, what have you got, or do you want to be the victim of the population that quite frankly finds the gun activist communities position wrong?