Originally Posted By: BroodBuster
Originally Posted By: Bay wolf
What I find interesting, (if that's appropriate in cases like these) is, if there are soooo many guns out there, why is no one shooting back? I mean, you rarely hear of anyone returning fire? The assailant is in a crowded venue and is firing for minutes, and the victims are hiding. Is there no one in any of these places with a carry license that can engage the perpetrator? Just doesn't seem plausible with "so many guns on the streets". In a lot of these shootings, as soon as law enforcement engages the shooter, he turns the gun on himself. Perhaps if someone immediately returned fire, it would save lives. Also, by returning fire, gun advocates could enforce the argument that guns are needed for self protection. Just saying...


They choose gun free zones so they don’t run into law abiding gun owners.


Oh so correct.
Only 2.2% of the mass shootings have occurred in places other than gun free zones.

It's so obvious.

Funny how the "mentally ill" are smart enough to figure that premeditated fact out isn't it?????????
Maybe calling them crazy is simply a cop out and it's truly the blued steel tool's fault.