Originally Posted By: Spoonfedhead
I know what I can do. That's not buy a license this year and help fund wdfw. This is bullchit year in year out we continue to purchase these licenses in hopes of having some fish to chase. Opportunities are running thin and we are loosing more fisheries every year. Wdfw simply are not doing there jobs and wasting money on stupid [Bleeeeep!]. I'll take my license money elsewhere. If I'm craving some salmon or steel I'll pay a tribal guide and get my eats from them. I feel this is a "pissing up a rope" situation with fish and wildlife anymore. fishing licences are not going to be raised this year because fish and wildlife knows that they can't raise license fees for less fish and opportunities in return. They better figure out a plan quick before they can't sell licenses anymore. I could see this catching on pretty quick. This seems like the only option at this point bay wolf.

If you think that wdfw cares if you buy a license or not you are woefully mistaken. Getting enough people to get on board with this is a lost cause. Of course it will mean that a few won't be on the water, but that just makes more room for the rest of us. Work for election reforms or not, but changing the current situation by not fishing locally is a losing strategy, and what makes you think going to Alaska or British Columbia is an answer? Because their salmon and steelhead situation ain't much better. A guide there may or may not put you on fish, but that doesn't tell you much about how they are dealing with fewer fish as a general rule. I try to do what I can, I attend the adviser's meeting for the areas I fish and provide input, learn lots I didn't know, meet other fisherfolk in my area, and attend the "dog and pony shows" that wdfw and the commission put on. These are more frustrating, but given the option of not saying anything other then on social media at least i have given it a chance to work. Bob R


Edited by bobrr (03/06/19 10:15 AM)