Occasionally, I agree with Salmo on things. The deviation to what seems off topic is still loosely related to the topic of fisheries management that is very political in nature. We should be challenging the faulty logic used by people when they select political candidates to vote for. It seems rather bizarre in the case of CM where social issues are the priority to him driven by his religious training, which his religion doesn’t support the stances he likely has on social issues. The social issues also do not directly impact him.

Anyway, both the socratic questioning and education serve the purpose of helping CM to reflect on what should truly be his priorities with voting in hopes that he can vote based upon his true priorities and not what he is wrongfully trained to believe or influenced by from society. He really values fiscal responsibility, the economy, outdoor recreation, fishing, hunting and these should what drives his decision making at the polls. Not social issues.



Streamer