Did you read my posts above? Kerry could have voted against the war. He did not. Kerry could have voiced his objection, for the record, to the war at the time if he had them. He did not. He could have pointed to the lack of data to substantiate a yes vote , he did not. He picked WMD as the reason he would single out and vote yes for the war. Which everyone in the world thought Sadam had at the time. He then changed his mind after it became politically oportunistic and convieniently opposed the handling of the war and voted not to fund it. Essentially saying he made a mistake. Then he said what congress and the president did should be subject to UN approval. Since when is congress and the president accountable to the UN? if you do not see the clear and present danger here it's hopeless.
This guy has gone back and forth several times on the issue, suggested the seccession of presdential and congressional authority to an outside entity and you would vote for him? Take all your feelings for GW and put them aside for a minute and clearly think about the actions Kerry has taken since he started running for president and show me how you think they are the actions that represent the best interest of the US.