If I recall, wasn't it the City of Forks that raised Holy Hell with the State over the "no-kill" rule, and finally got the concession granted that angers on some rivers could keep one (1) fish?

If the City of Forks and not raised such a stink, thinking their guides would all go broke and the town would die otherwise, would that "No-Kill" rule have applied to the OP rivers as well?

Would have, unless my memory is totally shot.

Mike

Mike