Stam, it's not a moral absolute, and don't let her define the argument for you...she can define how she wants, but you don't have to play that game.

It's about balance, and the smartest use of the resource...more opportunity, more economic benefits, and more fish spawning, which will consequently lead to even more opportunity, even more economic benefits, and even more fish spawning...which is good for the resource, good for the small towns that depend on the economic incentives of having a healthy resource, and good for those who spend the money chasing the resource.

More fish, more fishermen, more fishing days, more money spent on fishing, more fish spawning, more nutrients in the rivers...more, more, more.

Or...we can CnR a few pounds of native turds into septic tanks and sewer lines, have less fish, less fishing, less money spent on fishing, less fish spawning, and less nutrients in the river.

Fish on...

Todd