Well, maybe there needs to be that paradigm shift - let's say it would certainly shake up the status quo.

But the current reality is that the Plan includes extremely restrictive impacts on Stillaguamish NOR and hatchery produced "wild" (broodstock) fish.

I posed a question earlier asking for the tribal and non-tribal SUS impact stats on those particular fish. So far no response. Okay, maybe no one has that info at their finger tips so let me again opine that given the potential ripple effect of an 8% impact it should be shared equally between users.

If the tribes want to make a bigger deal out of that then let's have that discussion out in the open.