Originally Posted By: RICH G
Todd,

We spent 1/2 million dollars to have the samples first screened and then DNA tested blind tested by multiple labs, at universities or state crime labs, samples that had the correct profiles and specific mutations were tested further, we did 3 complete genomes on the three best samples, a paper was published independently. The truth is the scientific community was never going to allow the findings to make it through peer review.


Hi Rich,

As a member of the "scientific community" that you say "would not allow peer review", i respectfully request that you post the paper here, or a link to the report. I have reviewed many papers over the years and am interested in the publication you have chosen as well as the reviewers. Most often, the authors are responsible for the selection of the primary reviewer for their own paper, the primary usually asks a colleague or two to have a look as well. Not sure how "the scientific community" can prevent publication of something. of course, no publication would publish unsubstantiated claims, or claims based on fabricated data (not saying this is true in your case).
Better yet, send me a txt file of the DNA sequence you received from the contract lab you spent the $500k on (that's a lot of money, BTW I must be in the wrong business) and I'll see what I can find out.


Thanks,
willy
_________________________
"I know a taxidermy man back home. He gonna have a heart attack when he see what I brung him." -Quint