Originally Posted By: Lucky Louie
Update…

In the Russian scam/scandal there was the DNC and Hillary that paid for the unverified Steele dossier opposition research that was then used to obtain FISA warrants illegally to spy on American citizens. Who investigated this through the Special Counsel--- none other than Weismann an attendee of Hillary presidential victory party cryriver who then choose all democrats---a hand full of donors to Hillary and a Clinton foundation attorney to be on the Special Counsel investigation…

A fair balance of representation of those on the SC?

Part 1 of the report
Still, no Russian/Trump collusion crime found, while attempting to bury facts that Barr/Durham/Horowitz is now excavating.

Part 2 of the report
As stated at the Mueller report Congressional hearing—what laws exist that allow you (Mueller) to not exonerate Trump? Mueller could not state any laws because they do not exist. The standard for all prosecutors is to charge with indictment or no comment and certainly not to write an op/ed book.

All are presumed innocent until proven guilty--- not guilty until you prove your innocence as the Mueller report would suggest without existence of citation of law that simply does not exist.

Louie, Although I'm just speculating (like everyone else here) I'm convinced that if Barr and Trump had not misrepresented the findings of the Report, Mueller would have said nothing. But, no, these guys had to state "complete exoneration" before the full report came out. Mueller was entirely justified (IMHO) to try and correct the record.
_________________________
"You're not a g*dda*n looney Martini, you're a fisherman"

R.P. McMurphy - One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest