Ranker also pulled his support just before the hearing. Anybody know why?

Past performance is not a guarantee of future performance, but it does give you insight as to how it works and how they think. License fees have gone up and access has decreased, historically.

What additional opportunity do we hope to gain by supporting higher fees? What is the next game plan if a bill like this was to pass next year? What is the next opportunity to charge us more for than what we currently pay to do today? What guarantee do we have that additional fee revenue would be used as stated? Aren't there funds related to the Wynooche dam that have just been sitting in limbo?