Originally Posted By: OntheColumbia
Originally Posted By: stlhdr1 Then the sport anglers become the bad guys with their 8-10% mortality rate with hook and line?


Bulls Eye.

You already see SalmonforAll's Jim Wells waving that argument in the above article.[/quote



While "banning gillnets" sounds great (I'm for it) I believe the CCA-OR rank and file will be immensely dispointed when they learn that eliminating gillnets in favor of 'alternative methods' on the mainstem actually increases commercial harvest. That selective methods, don't settle the battle but instead strengthens the commercials' claim to a larger share of the available harvest due to their impacts being less than sports fishers.



Bingo..........

So what is CCA's game plan with this statement? Obviously it's been round-tabled....

Keith
_________________________
It's time to put the red rubber nose away, clown seasons over.