Originally Posted By: freespool
Originally Posted By: Somethingsmellsf




That is straight from that article, if there are less hatchery fish on the spawning beds then the hatcheries could produce more fish without impacting the ESA listed fish, thereby giving more opportunity to all user groups. [/quote


I would argue that the sport fleet fishing above the new selective commercial harvesters would in fact see far less opportunity.
So what your saying is CCA's plan is really just a plan to save the hatcheries.


Now your just grasping at straws and hoping someone will say something that will appease your twisting of the words opinion.

I will say this, without hatcheries there would be no opportunity for sports fishers as the commercials would be a HUGE impact on the wild fish because WDFW "HAS TO BY LAW" Provide a commercial opportunity, except possibly C&R on wild fish, something you preach about for the OP rivers as it pertains to a single person but not for GILL NETS on the Columbia. How the hell do you justify that?
_________________________
NRA Life member

The idea of a middle class life is slowly drifting away as each and every day we realize that our nation is becoming more of a corporatacracy.

I think name-calling is the right way to handle this one/Dan S

We're here from the WDFW and we're here to help--Uhh Ohh!