Originally Posted By: Todd

The only way to avoid having a delayed sportfishery for summer Chinook or summer run steelhead is the same only way that this will benefit ESA springers without ruining sportfishing for hatchery springers...and that's getting them off the river completely.

Fish on...

Todd


Not disagreeing with you there brother, but the likelihood of eliminating the comm fishery from the lower river is close to ZERO. Not playing commie apologist here... it is what it is.... esp so when the managing agencies are charged to ensure that viable commercial opportunities be made available. While I would personally love to see them go, I ain't holdin' my breath waitin'.

Seeing as they are here to stay for the foreseeable future, why not make their fishery as "clean" as it can be? Seems a nobler and more achievable goal than having them magically disappear into some black hole.

BTW anything that slows down the rate at which the impact is consumed makes it all the less likely that the impact would ever be exceeded. And until they actually figure out how to best use the new gear and where/when to most efficaciously deploy it, I don't think there's much danger of them catching too many any time soon.

Great grand scheme of things, I still say the benefits outweigh the risks.
_________________________
"Let every angler who loves to fish think what it would mean to him to find the fish were gone." (Zane Grey)

"If you don't kill them, they will spawn." (Carcassman)


The Keen Eye MD
Long Live the Kings!