After reading 9 pages of this it's apparent there's 3-4 people that understand the consequences...

*I don't care what group's back the theory of selective commercial fishing, I don't want to give up the extra hatchery fish to commercials.. Call me greedy but one thing I've noticed in life, every time you give something up you never get it back....

What I don't get is, didn't they already do some testing in the CR with these selective nets, Merwin traps, etc?

Why more testing? Is there actually a chance the states will veto the idea do to the fact that the selective fishing isn't productive enough? Why else test it? They already assume the low mortality rates...

Keith