I do need "a clue", as in -- I don't have a clue how charity that touts itself as a "conservation organization" would associate itself with a business organization that is proudly anti-conservation.

The same business organization that was recently sued by the State of Washington for fraud.

It just doesn't make sense. It's so plainly weird that you have to wonder if the CCA people that made the arrangement with BIAW, knew about BIAW's background and anti-fish lobbying? Or is CCA's leadership so personally wrapped up in Dino Rossi that none of that matters, and they'll use CCA to leverage his political campaign?

Either way, there's no shortage of good businesses to work with and CCA made a bad choice that reflects poorly on them.