Originally Posted By: Todd
What LB fails to realize is that this conversation has nothing to do with the advocacy process...a process, by the way, that many of us have participated in for many years before people around here ever heard of the CCA, or the CCA ever heard of salmon...it has entirely 100% to do with what they are advocating, which is a POS proposal that won't help fish or fishing...

Fish on...

Todd


Says you....

That says a lot about your level of understanding about cca in the first place. They knew about our issues for a long time. Its not their agenda we have adopted. The agenda is a local decision, the model used to achieve success is where cca national is important. Further, Ive read thru some other policies and actions that share many similarities. Oddly enough, its one of the many organizations that you have belonged to. Maybe you could explain why one of your organizations was succcessful in eliminating sport kill of wild steelhead and advocated (that word again) for a Feb 15 hatchery season on Puget Sound and yet have done nothing about the tribal gillnets that kill so many. How does a February 15 cut off benefit fish or fishing? You belong to TU and RFA and I cant remember either one of them supporting sports in the gillnet debate. In fact, TU was on the fense about 5127 although from the video, it sure looked like he favored getting rid of the commission. I also noticed you are not on the WSC board anymore.

http://wildsteelheadcoalition.org/mission.htm

http://wildsteelheadcoalition.org/bod-2.html


Edited by Lead Bouncer (12/26/10 06:09 PM)