Originally Posted By: MPM
When the Puyallup make a "we fish commercial; you have no sportfishing" proposal, is there any attempt to make it seem like this follows the 50/50 rationale of the Boldt decision?


That's one of my big questions too. Why isn't WDFWs counter to a 65/35 tribal-nontribal impact proposal 50/50 instead of 60/40? I imagine there's a good reason, I just don't know what it is.