Interesting that there claim includes that it is " essential to the tribes’ subsistence, economy". While that may be true for some tribes, it isn't true for others. For the Casino rich tribes, only a hand full of members may actually fish, and the overall revenue from fishing likely does not equal 1% of net revenue. When we get into culture, I then would ask about the need to drift net with jet sleds and other methods that greatly increase the ability to exploit the resource. To blame habitat loss strictly on non-tribal interests makes me wonder where they get the power to light up all those bill boards.