Even though I truly think that Trump is the most unfit person to ever serve as president, like a blind squirrel occasionally finding an acorn, I think Trump more likely than not made the right decision to whack Soleimani. It's a legitimate question to ask why Soleimani was even in Iraq, other than to foment further trouble. Conversely, it's equally legitimate to ask WTF is the US doing in Iraq? Iraq remains a sovereign nation, even if barely, that the US invaded in 2003 under false pretenses, following 911. If any action had been legitimate, the US could have invaded Saudi Arabia, where most of the 911 attackers hailed from.

Embassys are sovereign ground under international norms. Invading or attacking an embassy is an act of war, or terrorism if you prefer. Just as the 911 attack was. If the US Embassy attackers were Iranian backed, then whacking some Iranians was definitely quid pro quo. And if Iranian leaders have half a brain, they shouldn't provoke the self-proclaimed stable genius, because in fact he is about as stable as nitroglycerin.

As for Evo joining Blackwater or other defense contractors, it ain't likely. Although their physical and mental standards are lower than the US military, the bar isn't quite low enough when one consider's Evo's resume job history. Plus, I worry about the cool Ft Lewis Army guys if Evo shoots with them at Range 15. That's gotta' be a warning flag.