Looks like chums are overperforming, if I read that right?

If so, that's good, but absent evidence of significant Chinook movement, we're still shut down upstream, right?

The NT gillnetters should be required to report Chinook encounters (not just that they harvested what was modeled), as that information is critical to everyone's fisheries (including their own!).

To be clear, my position is that if there truly aren't enough kings on the gravel, none of us should be fishing. Otherwise, we should be out taking advantage of good coho and chum returns.