At the present time, wild fish actually matter because if the runs get too small ESA is invoked and it gets ugly (or uglier, if you prefer). To have the fisheries you seem to want, the wild fish must simply be written off. That is not currently legal to do, but have at it convincing Congress to change the law.

Rivrguy is spot on in that fisheries up north take much of the harvest. Plus, and this still seems too be ignored, the catch of GH fish in all the WA coastal fisheries (and even PS if tags show they wander in) count against the share.

Finally, in most cases the rec downside of rec fisheries is that they don't take a lot of fish in a short time. As Smalma has noted often, nets (and traps) are the only way to catch a lot of fish in a short amount of time.

If we went to a management scheme where there were no marine mixed stock fisheries and escapement goals can be as high as 2 kg/sq m (or even a little higher) then you could have decent bay and river fisheries but then absolute "sharing" would likely be out of whack.