It can go both ways, however, which is something we need to push for too. I know a Makah tribal fisher very well. He told me one time that many in the tribe felt they had a right to attempt to harvest 50% of any fish that passed them. I don't think they really cared how that affected anyone else. I think the state needs to hold fast that they don't give a rip which tribe takes the fish, as long as the 50/50 holds true. Any agreement should be clear that if any side goes over, adjustments down the line. It seems to me that we usually see set fisheries for the tribes, and adjustable ones for us.